Home Citroënët home

Site search powered by FreeFind
Do NOT include 'Citroen' in your search terms

AUTOCAR w/e 22/2.9 June 1974

LONG TERM REPORT

36,000 miles

By Chris Goffey

IMPRESSIVE BUT EXPENSIVE

Another visit to Slough produced an electrician who enlarged the hole in the plastic shroud round the instrument panel through which the stalks protruded. He did this with a hand file and he touched up the raw plastic edges with a dab of black paint. No materials charge; £3.09 labour!

Then at 32,000 miles a colleague took the car to Silverstone, and on his way back down the motorway, noticed an ominous cloud of smoke behind him.

He stopped under a motorway bridge, and waited an hour for an AA man to appear. They found that a bolt had dropped out of the back of the left-hand cylinder head, and the engine oil had been pumped out all over the engine compartment. When the engine was re-filled with oil and started, an ominous knocking started. Citroën diagnosed run camshaft bearings, accepted responsibility as they had so recently worked on the engine, and changed the bearings at no charge.

The only point to jar has always been the gear change, notchy and noisy, and completely out of character with the rest of the car. The clunk and bang if the change from first to second is rushed is most intrusive. The rest of the changes are similarly harsh and one wonders why the factory have not done more to solve this problem.

Towards the end of its time with me the Citroën showed only a few signs of its increasing mileage -the heated rear screen started to perform rather less efficiently than it had done, and the hot and cold blower motors seemed to have lost a few revs.

At 36,000 miles the cloth seats were stained, while it was possible to vacuum-off dog hairs and mud, the yellow cloth was looking dingy, and upholstery shampoo made but a small improvement. The driver`s seat had sagged towards the rear of the cushion, and if one jumped into the car quickly and sat down hard one made painful contact with a rail at the back of the seat. The coarse carpets however, wore extremely well and were still cleaning up well when we parted company. The long-term car was fitted with fixed seat-belts, and while the little plastics clamps were in place at the top of the belt near the pillar, they hooked away quite tidily.

I found the child safety seat was easy and convenient to fit.

By slackening two bolts inside the boot, the squab of the rear seat can be eased forward and the anchorage belts of the safety seat inserted into the boot between the seat back and the rear parcel shelf. Inside the boot it was easy to anchor the belts to the steel cross members behind the back seat with a minimum of drilling. The lower belts were more difficult since the back seat is all one cushion, there is no break between seat back and seat. There are however, two slits in the material in the centre of the back seat – presumably for fitting rear lap straps – and with a great deal of difficulty we managed to anchor one strap there.

During my ownership the car suffered no body damage save a slight dent on a front wing caused by an unidentified careless parker. The leading edge of the wing does in fact protrude almost beyond the bumper and it is easy to misjudge this when manoeuvring the car in tight places. The front wings can be unbolted a la DS for easy repair and replacement, but the rear wings cannot. I was intrigued to find, when I visited the Rennes factory where the GS is made, that the rear wing is in fact bolted on in production, but that a team of men then laboriously fill with solder and hand-flat the joint between the rear wing and the back screen pillar. Just why, I never did really discover, the engineers spoke about the “strength of the rear section” but the DS does not suffer from any weakness in the rear, and I cannot believe a single lead-filled joint can add much to structural rigidity.

In the current climate with the absurd price of petrol, the interest in this small-engined “luxury” car is even greater.

Comparisons of Road Test figures for the 1,220 c.c. and the 1,015 c.c. cars show the larger engine version to be just the more economical, through its higher gearing and lower-stressed engine. If you have to travel far in a small car, you will be hard pressed to find a competitor, let alone an equal in the class.

PERFORMANCE CHECK

COST OF OWNERSHIP

Maximum speeds
Gear
mph
kph
rpm

R/T
Staff
R/T
Staff
R/T
Staff
Top (mean)
90
92
145
148
6,300
6,430
Top (best
92
94
148
151
6,430
6,560
3rd
78
77
126
124
7,300
7,200
2nd
54
54
87
87
8,000
8,000
1st
34
34
55
55
8,000
8,000
Standing 1/4 mile R/T
21.5 sec
65 mph

Staff
21.3 sec
67 mph

Standing kilometre R/T
39.9 sec
79 mph

Staff
39.8 sec
78 mph

Acceleration time in sec. R/T 5.6 8.8 12.5 18.0 25.8 41.9
Staff 5.6 8.4 13.0 18.2 27.3 43.3
True speed mph 30 40 50 60 70 80
Indicated speed R/T 30 40 50 61 71 81
Indicated speed Staff 32 42 52 62 73 83
Speed range, Gear ratios and Time in Seconds

Top
(4.91)
3rd
(6.66)
2nd
(10.41)







mph
R/T
Staff
R/T
Staff
R/T
Staff
10-30
-
-
9.8
9.6
5.9
5.9
20-40
13.8
14.0
9.0
8.4
6.0
5.3
30-50
14.2
13.3
9.5
8.5


40-60
16.0
14.6
10.9
9.7


50-70
17.5
18.2
14.1
13.5


60-80
24.0
25.1
-
-


Fuel consumption
Overall mpg R/T 23.3 mpg 12.1 l/100 km


Staff 25.4 mpg 11.1 l/100 km
Running Costs Life in miles Cost per 10,000 miles


£
One gallon of 4 star fuel average cost today 55p 25.4 21.15
One pint of top up oil average cost today 29p 500 5.80
Front disc brake pads (set of 4) 4,000 19.05
Rear disc brake pads (set of 2) 7,000 6.87
Michelin ZX (145x14**) tyres (front pair) 50,000 3.58
Michelin ZX (145x14**) tyres (rear pair) 50,000 3.58
Total
424.81
Running cost per mile 4.2p

Approx. standing charges per year
*Insurance
35
Tax
25
Depreciation

Price when new
1,137
Trade in cash value (approx)
765
Typical advertised price (current)
880
Depreciation (actual over 2 years)
372
Total cost per mile (based on cash value) 8.6p
* Insurance cost is for a 28 year old driver, with 65 per cent no claims bonus, and with car garaged in Farnham Common, Bucks.
**Tyre size is actually 145x15
Note: "R/T" denotes performance figures for Citroën GC 1,015 c.c. tested in Autocar of 25 March 1971


I emailed Autocar and asked their permission to publish this report but they did not respond.
I assume therefore that they don't care.
© 1974 Autocar/2011 Citroënët